Skip to main content

State v. Rowell

Citations

  • 419 P.2d 966
  • 77 N.M. 124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that questions about the defendant’s prior convictions could have no other purpose than to prejudice the jury against the defendant
  • holding that prejudice resulted from the asking of the question itself, where prosecutor asked witness if she knew whether the Defendant was convicted in another state of same crime for which she was being tried
  • The prosecution's inquiry into the defendant's prior conviction \was fraught with such harm to defendant as to be irremediable.\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • reversal of conviction required when trial court’s admonition did not cure effect of prosecutor’s question concerning defendant’s prior convictions, which question was framed in improper manner and known by prosecutor to be irrelevant to issues at trial
  • damage caused by question held not cured by sustaining of objection
  • admonishment to jury insufficient to cure prejudice stemming from question concerning whether witness was aware of defendant’s prior criminal convictions for same offense; question was improper, unrelated to any issue in trial, and asked in a manner calculated to create prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moise, Spiess

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.