United States v. David Jimenez, Michael Anthony Daum, Louis Perez, Edward Fernandez, and Abrahim Zuriarrian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a witness violated a Rule 615 exclusion order by reading the testimony of another agent witness from a prior mistrial
• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to grant a mistrial or strike testimony due to a violation of a sequestration order
• finding violation of Rule 615 when, before testifying, one witness read the testimony of another witness from a prior mistrial
• before testifying a government witness read the testimony of another witness from a prior mistrial
• Rule 615 does not distinguish between hearing testimony and reading it
• “Reading prior trial testimony violates [a Rule 615] sequestration order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).