State v. Reinhold

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that reference to the defendant’s selective silence did not violate Doyle because the defendant “did not invoke his right to remain silent”
• construing article VI, section 27, of the Arizona Constitution and according deference to recent cases from the State of Washington interpreting an identical provision of its state constitution
• construing article VI, section 27, of the Arizona Constitution and according deference to recent cases from the State of Washington interpreting an identical provision of its state constitution
• construing article VI, section 27, of the Arizona Constitution and according deference to recent cases from the State of Washington interpreting an identical provision of its state constitution
• theft of victim’s money completed the story of crime where victim testified defendant used her money after raping her to buy cigarettes and beer before they returned to her apartment
• deference accorded recent Washington cases interpreting identical provision of its state constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).