Arizona Supreme Court· 5/31/1979

State v. Reinhold

Citations

597 P.2d 532
123 Ariz. 50
1979 Ariz. LEXIS 386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that reference to the defendant’s selective silence did not violate Doyle because the defendant “did not invoke his right to remain silent”
construing article VI, section 27, of the Arizona Constitution and according deference to recent cases from the State of Washington interpreting an identical provision of its state constitution
construing article VI, section 27, of the Arizona Constitution and according deference to recent cases from the State of Washington interpreting an identical provision of its state constitution
construing article VI, section 27, of the Arizona Constitution and according deference to recent cases from the State of Washington interpreting an identical provision of its state constitution
theft of victim’s money completed the story of crime where victim testified defendant used her money after raping her to buy cigarettes and beer before they returned to her apartment
deference accorded recent Washington cases interpreting identical provision of its state constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Struckmeyer, Cameron, Hays, Holohan, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Reinhold

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

State v. Reinhold
Court of Appeals of Washington· 2017-02-07

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.