Arizona Supreme Court· 1/12/1976
State v. Landrum
Citations
- 544 P.2d 664
- 112 Ariz. 555
- 1976 Ariz. LEXIS 197
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that questions about the suspect’s identify were “clearly neutral, nonaccusatory in nature, and in furtherance of proper preliminary investigation” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
- asking for a suspect’s name is not always an interrogation within the meaning of Miranda
- explaining Miranda does not apply to a detective’s “clearly neutral, nonaccusatory” questions “in furtherance of proper preliminary investigation”
- law enforcement officer may question individual as to his name after detention but prior to issuing Miranda warnings
- “To hold that a law enforcement officer could not question an individual as to his name after he had been lawfully detained, but prior to receiving his Miranda warnings, would be the height of absurdity.”
- excluded time for competency hearing begins on date motion filed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Hays, Holohan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. HardingArizona Supreme Court· 1983-09-06· cited 111×
- State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court· 1981-10-13· cited 101×
- State v. ValdezArizona Supreme Court· 1989-01-31· cited 98×
- State v. GretzlerArizona Supreme Court· 1980-04-21· cited 92×
- State v. MorseArizona Supreme Court· 1980-09-18· cited 63×
- State v. SullivanArizona Supreme Court· 1981-10-15· cited 47×
- State v. ReinholdArizona Supreme Court· 1979-05-31· cited 39×
- Mills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-09-15· cited 37×
- State v. RoblesArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-25· cited 35×
- State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court· 1977-05-11· cited 33×
- People v. O'BRIENMichigan Court of Appeals· 1982-02-17· cited 31×
- State v. CejaArizona Supreme Court· 1976-02-11· cited 29×
- State v. FlowerArizona Supreme Court· 1989-05-30· cited 22×
- State v. StarcevichCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-12-16· cited 20×
- State v. WynnCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-02-15· cited 17×
- State v. StarrCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-05-25· cited 15×
- State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-10-20· cited 13×
- Grimes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-01-11· cited 13×
- State v. FarmerArizona Supreme Court· 1980-09-05· cited 10×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-07-20· cited 7×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1966-12-12· cited 2,107×
- State v. GonzalesArizona Supreme Court· 1970-03-12· cited 77×
- State Ex Rel. Berger v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1974-12-20· cited 62×
- State v. TellezCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-09-21· cited 40×
- State v. RavenellSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1964-07-31· cited 38×
- State v. JaramilloArizona Supreme Court· 1974-04-10· cited 26×
- State v. BainchArizona Supreme Court· 1973-01-18· cited 25×
- State v. GarciaArizona Supreme Court· 1967-10-26· cited 19×
- State v. GasteloArizona Supreme Court· 1975-03-06· cited 17×
- State v. RobisonArizona Supreme Court· 1965-11-24· cited 15×
- State v. SmallCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1973-09-27· cited 7×
- State v. MathisArizona Supreme Court· 1974-01-10· cited 6×
- State v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-05-13· cited 6×
- State v. HockerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-10-21· cited 4×
- Hill v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1917-05-19· cited 3×
- State v. RojasArizona Supreme Court· 1968-07-11· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.