Skip to main content

State v. Landrum

Citations

  • 544 P.2d 664
  • 112 Ariz. 555
  • 1976 Ariz. LEXIS 197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that questions about the suspect’s identify were “clearly neutral, nonaccusatory in nature, and in furtherance of proper preliminary investigation” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • asking for a suspect’s name is not always an interrogation within the meaning of Miranda
  • explaining Miranda does not apply to a detective’s “clearly neutral, nonaccusatory” questions “in furtherance of proper preliminary investigation”
  • law enforcement officer may question individual as to his name after detention but prior to issuing Miranda warnings
  • “To hold that a law enforcement officer could not question an individual as to his name after he had been lawfully detained, but prior to receiving his Miranda warnings, would be the height of absurdity.”
  • excluded time for competency hearing begins on date motion filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Hays, Holohan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.