· 10/1/1992
Stephens v. Bohlman
Citations
- 838 P.2d 600
- 314 Or. 344
- 1992 Ore. LEXIS 176
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when this court interprets a statute, that interpretation becomes a part of the statute as if written into it at the time of its enactment
- when court interprets a statute, that interpretation becomes a part of the statute as if written into it at the time of its enactment
- this court's interpretation of a statute becomes a part of the statute as if written into it at the time of its enactment
- this court’s interpretation of a statute becomes a part of the statute as if written into it at the time of its enactment
- Supreme Court interpretation of a statute becomes a part of the statute as if it were written into it at the time of its enactment
- Supreme Court interpretations of statutes become part of the statutes and are binding on all courts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carson, Peterson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Unis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.