Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/8/1992

State v. Redmond

Citations

834 P.2d 516
114 Or. App. 197
1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

considering the fact that an officer’s “efforts to stop defendant had been obstructed by a car associated with defendant” as a specific and articulable fact supporting the officer’s frisk of the defendant
officer’s testimony about his impressions of jail’s inventory procedures was not sufficient to establish what those inventory procedures were
“[Pjerceptions of the stereotypical practices of motorcycle club members is the kind of generalized suspicion that seldom will constitute a reasonable suspicion based on particularized facts.”
warrantless seizure of weapons from defendant’s person upheld as reasonable safety measure
warrantless seizure of weapons from defendant's person upheld as reasonable safety measure
officer could frisk the defendant for officer safety purposes where the defendant was among a group of motorcycle riders; was stopped at one in the morning; was wearing gang clothing, including a patch that identified him as the “enforcer” for the gang; and was armed with a knife

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buttler, Rossman, De Muniz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.