State v. MEDINGER

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• accepting argument that, “because the federal [legal] stan- dard is less stringent” than Oregon law, determination that arrest was not supported by probable cause under Oregon law obviated need to reach federal question
• the defendant’s refusal to answer the officer’s questions was not “strange” or “furtive”; rather, it was the exercise of a constitutionally protected right, and therefore did not affect the probable cause analysis
• state failed to carry its burden of proving that evidence would have been inevitably discovered where it failed to prove that a properly authorized inventory policy existed and required an inspection that would have led to discovery of the challenged evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).