State v. Bradford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “we have cau- tioned that an officer’s perceptions of the stereotypical prac- tices of gang members is the kind of generalized suspicion that seldom will constitute a reasonable suspicion based on particularized facts” (internal quotation marks and brack- ets omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-06· cited 5×
• State v. Lora
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-06-30· cited 2×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bates
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-12-22· cited 243×
• State v. Maciel-Figueroa
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-02· cited 137×
• State v. Miglavs
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-05-20· cited 56×
• State v. Vasquez-Villagomez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-02-26· cited 41×
• State v. Redmond
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-07-08· cited 20×
• State v. Pope
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-01-27· cited 17×
• State v. Huffman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-10-14· cited 17×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-06· cited 17×
• State v. Garcia
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-09· cited 14×
• State v. Miglavs
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-02-19· cited 11×
• State v. Hebrard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-08-03· cited 9×
• City of Portland v. Weigel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-03· cited 7×
• State v. Wiggins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-10-16· cited 6×
• State v. Decker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-22· cited 5×