State v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the presence of multiple people can heighten an officer’s safety concern so as to permit a patdown of one person” when there are weapons present
• officer safety doctrine did not justify patdown at 11:00 a.m. in a jaywalking stop when defendant would not make eye contact and was a “little” uncomfortable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-06· cited 17×
• State v. Blackstone
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-12-20· cited 7×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-02-23· cited 4×
• State v. Kennedy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-08· cited 3×
• State v. C. J. G.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-01-27· cited 2×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ehly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
• State v. Bates
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-12-22· cited 243×
• State v. Miglavs
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-05-20· cited 56×
• State v. Rodriguez-Perez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-09· cited 29×
• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-10-22· cited 25×
• State v. Redmond
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-07-08· cited 20×
• State v. Dyer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-11-25· cited 14×
• State v. Hendricks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-06-13· cited 9×
• Johnson v. Short
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-06-06· cited 6×
• State v. Weber
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-08-31· cited 4×