Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/20/2012
State v. Washington
Citations
- 293 Kan. 732
- 268 P.3d 475
- 2012 Kan. LEXIS 36
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating sufficiency of preliminary 35 examination must be challenged by motion to dismiss and denial of such motion is reviewed de novo
- explaining the evidence does not need to prove guilt conclusively but must be enough to make a reasonable person believe that the defendant committed the offense
- noting probable cause to bind a defendant over for trial \'signifies evidence sufficient to cause a person of ordinary prudence and caution to conscientiously entertain a reasonable belief of the accused's guilt'\
- noting probable cause to bind a defendant over for trial \'signifies evidence sufficient to cause a person of ordinary prudence and caution to conscientiously entertain a reasonable belief of the accused's guilt'\
- noting probable cause to bind a defendant over for trial \'signifies evidence sufficient to cause a person of ordinary prudence and caution to conscientiously entertain a reasonable belief of the accused's guilt'\
- evidence presented at the preliminary hearing should be viewed in a light favorable to the prosecution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Luckert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. WARRIORSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-05-11· cited 121×
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-07-27· cited 81×
- State v. GillilandSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-05-11· cited 73×
- State v. BettsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2022-07-29· cited 69×
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-04-06· cited 47×
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2025-02-21· cited 34×
- State v. RochelleSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-04-12· cited 33×
- State v. MirelesSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-05-10· cited 32×
- State v. LundbergSupreme Court of Kansas· 2019-07-19· cited 18×
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2020-04-24· cited 16×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-12-21· cited 16×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-08-16· cited 12×
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas· 2020-04-24· cited 11×
- State v. RozellSupreme Court of Kansas· 2022-04-22· cited 11×
- State v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-05-02· cited 8×
- State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2018-07-20· cited 6×
- State v. BolingerCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2024-04-12
- State v. RigginsCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2025-09-12
- State v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2026-01-23
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. EllmakerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-12-04· cited 96×
- State v. ColstonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-07-23· cited 94×
- State v. Ho K. DuongSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-08-12· cited 76×
- State v. SaltsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-02-06· cited 73×
- State v. SherrySupreme Court of Kansas· 1983-07-15· cited 66×
- State v. NguyenSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-12-14· cited 56×
- State v. CalvinSupreme Court of Kansas· 2005-02-18· cited 53×
- State v. FredrickSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-04-29· cited 50×
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-06-13· cited 49×
- State v. RansomSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-05-15· cited 49×
- State v. MakthepharakSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-10-31· cited 39×
- State v. ValladarezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2009-05-08· cited 39×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-01-07· cited 34×
- State v. Salcido-CorralSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-05-30· cited 33×
- State v. HortonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-02-02· cited 26×
- State v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas· 1986-12-05· cited 25×
- State v. BockertSupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-04-21· cited 25×
- State v. BergSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-12-08· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.