Skip to main content
Idaho Supreme Court· 11/22/1993

State v. Ransom

Citations

  • 864 P.2d 149
  • 124 Idaho 703
  • 1993 Ida. LEXIS 181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the defendant had been convicted of sexual abuse as a lesser-ineluded offense of lewd conduct
  • noting that the defendant had been convicted of sexual abuse as a lesser-included offense of lewd conduct
  • affirming the district court’s denial of new trial based on victim’s recantation where juvenile victim testified she was pressured by a family member to say that the sexual abuse had not occurred
  • proper role of trial court in evaluating motion of continuance necessitates weighing competing interests of the State and defendant
  • proper role of trial court in evaluating motion of continuance necessitates weighing competing interests of the State and defendant
  • where the Supreme Court stated a new trial based on recanted testimony was allowed “if the defendant (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bistline, McDevitt, Johnson, Trout, Reinhardt, Tern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.