Idaho Supreme Court· 11/22/1993
State v. Ransom
Citations
- 864 P.2d 149
- 124 Idaho 703
- 1993 Ida. LEXIS 181
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the defendant had been convicted of sexual abuse as a lesser-ineluded offense of lewd conduct
- noting that the defendant had been convicted of sexual abuse as a lesser-included offense of lewd conduct
- affirming the district court’s denial of new trial based on victim’s recantation where juvenile victim testified she was pressured by a family member to say that the sexual abuse had not occurred
- proper role of trial court in evaluating motion of continuance necessitates weighing competing interests of the State and defendant
- proper role of trial court in evaluating motion of continuance necessitates weighing competing interests of the State and defendant
- where the Supreme Court stated a new trial based on recanted testimony was allowed “if the defendant (1
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bistline, McDevitt, Johnson, Trout, Reinhardt, Tern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.