Skip to main content

State v. Lambert

Citations

  • 612 N.W.2d 810
  • 2000 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 134
  • 2000 WL 895228

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was not a reasonable probability of a different result even if counsel performed ineffectively in failing to object to a jury instruction stating that a metal pipe was a dangerous weapon as a matter of law
  • holding in order to sustain a burglary conviction the State must prove the accused formed the intent to commit an assault at the time of entry
  • noting that to sustain a conviction for burglary, the State must prove an intent by the defendant to commit an assault at the time of entry
  • recognizing there must be a concurrence of the actus reus and the mens rea
  • recognizing there must be a concurrence of the actus reus and the mens rea
  • recognizing there must be a concurrence of the actus reus and the mens rea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Snell, Carter, Neuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.