Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1/9/2004
State v. Randle
Citations
- 81 P.3d 1254
- 32 Kan. App. 2d 291
- 2004 Kan. App. LEXIS 5
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a “term which is widely used and readily comprehensible need not have a defining instruction”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rulon, C.J., Green, J., and Stephen D. Hill, District Judge, Assigned
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-01-24· cited 140×
- State v. BeachSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-04-25· cited 74×
- State v. LongSupreme Court of Kansas· 1984-01-13· cited 50×
- State v. AldershofSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-11-06· cited 35×
- State v. BatesonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-12-11· cited 18×
- State v. GlymphSupreme Court of Kansas· 1977-04-09· cited 14×
- State v. RequenaCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-11-02· cited 8×
- State v. BosbyCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-05-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.