Skip to main content

State v. Ramos

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 3588

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting certain drug evidence at trial despite there being a break in the chain of custody, as there was sufficient testimony presented at trial identifying the drug evidence as the drugs possessed by appellant. In addition, appellant's conviction for aggravated possession of drugs was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.