Ohio Supreme Court· 5/19/1982
State v. Hankerson
Citations
- 70 Ohio St. 2d 87
- 434 N.E.2d 1362
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- at a time when circumstantial evidence had a stricter application
- the defendant must be “conscious” of the object's presence
- the defendant must be “conscious” of the object's presence
- dominion and control satisfies possession
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Celebrezze, First, Holmes, Krupansky, Locher, Shannon, Sweeney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
289 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. NicelyOhio Supreme Court· 1988-10-19· cited 472×
- Mark A. Criss v. The City of Kent Rick Haury, Officer, Kent City Police DepartmentSixth Circuit· 1988-12-28· cited 286×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-05-23· cited 181×
- State v. O'DellOhio Supreme Court· 1989-08-23· cited 174×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-12-09· cited 136×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 1989-10-18· cited 136×
- State v. PilgrimOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-10-08· cited 92×
- State v. CarpenterOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-14· cited 56×
- State v. GavinOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-07-13· cited 43×
- State v. FryeOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-12· cited 40×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2005-07-14· cited 38×
- State v. BellOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-31· cited 34×
- State v. BargerOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-08· cited 32×
- State v. BustamanteOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-12· cited 31×
- State v. KoonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-03· cited 31×
- State v. RastbichlerOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-21· cited 28×
- State v. BallOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-09· cited 27×
- State v. BrooksOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-13· cited 26×
- State v. ByrdOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-06· cited 25×
- State v. VollOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-27· cited 24×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WoleryOhio Supreme Court· 1976-06-02· cited 520×
- State v. KuligOhio Supreme Court· 1974-03-27· cited 156×
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-08-04· cited 136×
- State v. GravenOhio Supreme Court· 1978-04-26· cited 50×
- Hector Saldivar Amaya v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1967-02-13· cited 38×
- State v. MotykaSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1973-01-12· cited 17×
- State v. GoodinOhio Supreme Court· 1978-12-08· cited 14×
- State v. DaughertyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-06-24· cited 5×
Other cases named State v. Hankerson
19 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of Florida· 2011-06-30· cited 34×
- State v. HankersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-01-28· cited 9×
- State v. HankersonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-12-15· cited 8×
- State v. HankersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-04-22· cited 7×
- State v. HankersonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1992-05-22· cited 5×
- State v. HankersonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1992-05-22· cited 4×
- State v. HankersonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2003-12-11· cited 3×
- State v. HankersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2005-11-10· cited 3×
- State v. HankersonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1992-10-08· cited 1×
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-07-09
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-10-19
- State v. HankersonUtah Supreme Court· 2005-08-05
- State v. HankersonWashington Supreme Court· 2015-12-02
- State v. HankersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-04-29
- State v. HankersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-06-22
- State v. HankersonCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2005-09-15
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1977-09-12
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1993-02-05
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-10-19
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.