Skip to main content

State v. Fowler

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 361

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by failing to suppress appellant's statements to detectives where appellant validly waived his Miranda rights and where appellant's statements were not the product of impermissible, coercive police conduct. In addition, the trial court properly admitted certain records from Google at trial as self-authenticating documents under Evid.R. 902(11). Because the Google records were not testimonial in nature, their admission did not violate appellant's right of confrontation. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.