Skip to main content

State v. Mayo

Citations

  • 303 Or. App. 525
  • 465 P.3d 267

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the two limited circumstances in which a prosecutor may comment on a defendant’s failure to present or contradict evidence are (1) affirmative defenses, and (2
  • applying abuse of discretion standard to a trial court’s Cite as 338 Or App 730 (2025) 735 decision to overrule an objection to closing arguments
  • applying abuse of dis- cretion standard to the trial court’s decision to overrule an objection to closing arguments
  • state’s argument shifted burden to the defendant to create reasonable doubt
  • reviewing for abuse of discretion
  • reviewing for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.