Skip to main content

State v. Rainey

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2608

Syllabus

CRIM.R. 33(B) — UNAVOIDABLY PREVENTED — NEWLY-DISCOVERED EVIDENCE: The common pleas court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant's Crim.R. 33(B) motion for leave to file a new-trial motion based on newly-discovered evidence where the new evidence, the codefendant's confession, was not newly discovered but merely newly available for defendant's use, and where defendant failed to show that, by using reasonable diligence, he could not have discovered the substance of codefendant's now-available testimony within the 120-day period following the return of the jury verdicts.

Judges: Bock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.