State v. Dahl

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, when legislature referred to a “rebuttable presumption” within the statutes at issue in that case, it intended to refer to the procedural device described in ORS 40.120
• concluding that, when legislature referred to a \rebuttable presumption\ within the statutes at issue in that case, it intended to refer to the procedural device described in ORS 40.120
• holding that, where ordinance was civil, municipality must only prove elements by a preponderance of the evidence under Oregon law; mandatory rebuttable presumption was therefore constitutional
• explaining that, under Oregon law, a presumption ordinarily shifts the burden of production and persuasion
• explaining that, under Oregon law, a presumption ordinarily shifts the burden of production and persuasion
• explaining that, under Oregon law, a presumption ordinarily shifts the burden of production and persuasion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pereida-Alba v. Coursey
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-01-15· cited 82×
• Janowski v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 40×
• State v. Paragon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-09-15· cited 29×
• Bobo v. Kulongoski
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-02-25· cited 27×
• Damon v. City of Kansas City
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2013-11-26· cited 21×
• Ivanov v. Farmers Insurance
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-05-08· cited 18×
• Krieger v. City of Rochester
  New York Supreme Court· 2013-11-01· cited 15×
• State v. Nollen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-11-10· cited 13×
• State v. Couch
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-29· cited 12×
• Saif Corp. v. Thompson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-08-04· cited 12×
• State v. Kuhlman
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-09-22· cited 6×
• DeVita v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-09-05· cited 6×
• Reed v. Breton
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2005-01-20· cited 4×
• State v. Swanson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-09-29· cited 3×
• State v. Greenlick
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-02-07· cited 2×
• State v. Crawford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-10-04· cited 1×
• SAIF v. Thompson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-08-04

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Sandstrom v. Montana
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,990×
• Leary v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 1,672×
• Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.
  Supreme Court· 1976-07-01· cited 1,262×
• State v. Wyatt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 659×
• Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. Turnipseed
  Supreme Court· 1910-12-19· cited 426×
• Lavine v. Milne
  Supreme Court· 1976-03-03· cited 184×
• State v. Rainey
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 73×
• Matter of Marriage of Denton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-01-08· cited 72×
• Matter of Marriage of Massee
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1999-01-22· cited 66×
• State v. Stilling
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-02-21· cited 55×
• Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-07-18· cited 23×
• State v. Selness
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-09-19· cited 17×
• State v. Clay
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-08-09· cited 10×
• State v. Dahl
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-11-20· cited 6×