Court of Appeals of Maryland· 3/31/1988
West v. State
Citations
- 539 A.2d 231
- 312 Md. 197
- 1988 Md. LEXIS 38
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the theft statute revisions and consolidation abrogated the common law crime of larceny
- holding that where the victim “was never placed in fear; she did not resist; she was not injured,” “the evidence was not sufficient to establish all elements of the crime of robbery”
- noting that even though the penalties for armed and unarmed robberies are now fixed by statute, the crimes remain common law crimes
- explaining that for robbery, force, actual or constructive, must be sufficient to compel the victim to part with his or her property
- explaining that for robbery, force, actual or constructive, 5 must be sufficient to compel the victim to part with his or her property
- observing that Maryland simple robbery -includes larceny so long as the “victim resisted the taking and ... her resistance had been overcome,” even absent physical injury or force directed at the victim’s person
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
85 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Oken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-09-17· cited 141×
- State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-04-13· cited 132×
- Ball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-09-10· cited 121×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-05-29· cited 115×
- Snowden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-14· cited 113×
- Wiggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-11-08· cited 102×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-04-28· cited 96×
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-08· cited 89×
- Moye v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-04-16· cited 88×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-07-29· cited 87×
- Fisher and Utley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-12-17· cited 83×
- Metheny v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-07-24· cited 81×
- Hebron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-22· cited 80×
- United States v. Roger RedrickD.C. Circuit· 2016-11-08· cited 73×
- State v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-05-14· cited 66×
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-02-17· cited 60×
- United States v. Damien RileyFourth Circuit· 2017-05-09· cited 45×
- Braxton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-06· cited 43×
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-04-20· cited 42×
- Burks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-05-26· cited 41×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-06-10· cited 300×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-04-24· cited 100×
- Pugh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-05-30· cited 84×
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-09-01· cited 78×
- Hadder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-04-14· cited 74×
- People v. PattonIllinois Supreme Court· 1979-05-18· cited 57×
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-03-07· cited 55×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-11-20· cited 51×
- Rice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1987-11-05· cited 43×
- Polansky v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-07· cited 32×
- Raiford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-07-08· cited 27×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-05-26· cited 25×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1969-09-25· cited 18×
- Harrison v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-02-15· cited 18×
- Raiford v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-07-13· cited 16×
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-05-26· cited 15×
- In re Michael G.New York Family Court· 1983-01-10· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.