Fourth Circuit· 4/22/1994
United States v. Edward Dane Jeffus
Citations
- 22 F.3d 554
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8429
- 1994 WL 141061
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- having a trained dog sniff the perimeter of the vehicle in a public place does not constitute a search
- upholding search of pretrial detainee’s cell on basis that defendant did not have an expectation of privacy in his jail cell
- no search when officers conduct dog-sniff of perimeter of car lawfully stopped in public place
- “When the dog ‘alerted positive’ for the presence of drugs, the officer was given probable cause for the search that followed.”
- drug dog’s positive alert gave officer probable cause for the ensuing search of defendant’s automobile
- because claim for damages entails determination of whether 23 officers’ alleged conduct violated plaintiff’s rights, the separate request for declaratory relief is 24 subsumed by damages action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Niemeyer, Butzner, Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- City of Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court· 1996-07-03· cited 850×
- United States v. BranchFourth Circuit· 2008-08-20· cited 319×
- State v. EnglandTennessee Supreme Court· 2000-05-30· cited 299×
- Simmons v. PoeFourth Circuit· 1995-03-01· cited 289×
- Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court· 1996-07-03· cited 228×
- United States v. Vincent Carnelius Eura, United States of America v. Vincent Carnelius EuraFourth Circuit· 2006-02-24· cited 154×
- Christopher Payne v. Jahal TaslimiFourth Circuit· 2021-05-27· cited 111×
- United States v. Paul N. Johnson Darryl Jonns Lamont Bell and Craig Richardson, Paul N. JohnsonThird Circuit· 1995-08-16· cited 106×
- State v. WiegandSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-13· cited 104×
- United States v. KellyFourth Circuit· 2010-01-28· cited 102×
- State v. Juarez-GodinezOregon Supreme Court· 1997-08-21· cited 79×
- United States v. MasonFourth Circuit· 2010-12-08· cited 76×
- United States v. HartsellFourth Circuit· 1997-10-16· cited 37×
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-06-01· cited 26×
- United States v. Robert HillFourth Circuit· 2015-01-13· cited 23×
- State v. ProvetCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-01-31· cited 13×
- State v. BibbinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-12-01· cited 8×
- United States v. BanksE.D. Virginia· 1997-07-14· cited 5×
- United States v. McAllisterSixth Circuit· 2002-03-14· cited 5×
- United States v. HuangD. New Mexico· 2014-04-22· cited 5×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 11,438×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 8,014×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- United States v. RusherFourth Circuit· 1992-06-03· cited 809×
- United States v. Jose Luis Guzman and Sonia Cruz-LazoTenth Circuit· 1988-12-30· cited 381×
- United States v. James Hassan ElFourth Circuit· 1993-09-13· cited 274×
- United States v. Timothy Andrew Smith, Stephen Lawrence SwindellEleventh Circuit· 1986-09-16· cited 259×
- Jones v. MurrayFourth Circuit· 1992-04-07· cited 239×
- United States v. William O. TriggSeventh Circuit· 1989-07-12· cited 138×
- United States v. Steve McKinnonEleventh Circuit· 1993-03-09· cited 64×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.