Washington Supreme Court· 11/16/2006

State v. Price

Citations

158 Wash. 2d 630

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Both the United States Supreme Court and this court have drawn a distinction between unavailability for confrontation clause purposes, and unavailability for hearsay purposes.”
whether State’s admission of hearsay statements violated defendant’s confrontation rights is a constitutional question subject to de novo review
when a witness is asked questions about his or her prior statements, but answers that he or she is unable to remember the prior statements, this provides the defendant sufficient opportunity for cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alexander, Bridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.