Tatham v. Rogers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Section 413(a) should be viewed as extinguishing a remedy rather than a right, and therefore, the defense is waivable
• holding that Section 413(a) should be viewed as extinguishing a remedy rather than a right, and therefore, the defense is waivable
• holding Section 413(a) to be a statute of limitations as “it operates in a way that, practically speaking, extinguishes a remedy rather than a right”
• distinguishing McDevitt as involving statute of repose, which is jurisdictional
• distinguishing McDevitt as involving statute of repose, which is jurisdictional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).