State v. Portigue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “police had not so restricted the defendant’s freedom of movement . . . that she was in effect ... in police custody”
• police need not honor defendant’s assertion of right to silence or counsel where defendant was not in custody
• “The Miranda safeguards apply only to situations involving a custodial interrogation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gravel
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-12-31· cited 43×
• State v. Carroll
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-07-22· cited 43×
• State v. Lewis
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-10-09· cited 24×
• State v. Dedrick
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1989-10-06· cited 22×
• State v. Tucker
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1989-04-07· cited 17×
• State v. Gagnon
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-12-09· cited 10×
• State v. Lescard
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1986-10-02· cited 6×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Edwards v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
• Oregon v. Mathiason
  Supreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
• Michigan v. Mosley
  Supreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
• California v. Beheler
  Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 2,048×
• Oregon v. Bradshaw
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,351×
• United States v. Joseph A. Timpani
  First Circuit· 1981-12-01· cited 54×
• United States v. Doyle Kent Ogden
  Fifth Circuit· 1978-05-30· cited 28×
• State v. Reynolds
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1984-02-03· cited 25×
• State v. Miskolczi
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1983-08-31· cited 21×