Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 7/22/1994

State v. Carroll

Citations

138 N.H. 687
645 A.2d 82
1994 N.H. LEXIS 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that state constitution, which offered greater protection than federal constitution with respect to voluntariness, did not apply absent state action
holding that state constitution, which offered greater protection than federal constitution with respect to voluntariness, did not apply absent state action
upholding trial court’s ruling that a confession was voluntary where, among other things, “there was no evidence that the defendant needed or was deprived of food”
explaining relevant to no custody finding that defendant requested interview, drove himself to the interview, and on prior day had requested and received permission to leave
explaining relevant to no custody finding that defendant requested interview, drove himself to the interview, and on prior day had requested and received permission to leave
defendant’s statement that he “wantfed] to go home” suggests “that the defendant himself believed that he could have left if he so chose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.