State v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, because the defendant’s “act of leaving the bag in the parking lot [and walking away] was not accompanied by any words or con- duct indicating that he intended to leave the bag behind,” the defendant had not relinquished his interests in that property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gatto
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-05-13· cited 7×
• State v. Pilgrim
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-09· cited 6×
• State v. Montiel-Delvalle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-06-17· cited 5×
• State v. Lewis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-09-16· cited 3×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
• State v. Ehly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
• State v. Tucker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-03-09· cited 61×
• State v. Pidcock
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-08-02· cited 41×
• State v. Cook
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-10-18· cited 39×
• State v. Brown
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-05-27· cited 19×
• State v. Kendall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-04-25· cited 12×
• State v. Morton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-11· cited 10×
• State v. Bernabo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-12-10· cited 9×
• State v. McKee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-07-22· cited 9×
• State v. Stafford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-11-06· cited 7×