State v. Phillips

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• OEC 609 “pre- empt[s] any balancing of the probative value of the convic- tion against its prejudicial effect to the defendant” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Aranda
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-20· cited 9×
• State v. Kindred
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-09· cited 5×
• Dept. of Human Services v. D. C. B.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-04-21· cited 3×
• State v. Acosta
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-05· cited 3×
• State v. Aranda
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2024-05-31
• Upham v. Forster
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-15
• Loper v. Brakel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-09-17

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• Green v. Bock Laundry MacHine Co.
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-22· cited 632×
• State v. King
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-01-31· cited 170×
• State v. Pratt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-06-17· cited 107×
• State v. McClure
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-12-18· cited 85×
• Department of Human Services v. G. D. W.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2012-12-13· cited 40×
• Marshall v. Martinson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-02-14· cited 35×
• State v. Jancsek
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-11-25· cited 32×
• Schmidt v. Mt. Angel Abbey
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-12-24· cited 24×
• State v. Lykins
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-04-23· cited 20×
• State v. Rush
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-01-17· cited 16×
• State ex rel Rosenblum v. Nisley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2020-09-24· cited 11×
• State v. Smith
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-11-20· cited 8×