Skip to main content

State v. Acosta

Citations

  • 311 Or. App. 136
  • 489 P.3d 608

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court erred in excluding Facebook messages that “included substance that was uniquely associated with [the] defendant” or only a very small group of people who were using the account at the time
  • concluding that the trial court erred 12 in excluding Facebook messages that “included substance that was uniquely 13 associated with [the] defendant” or only a very small group of people who were 14 using the account at the time
  • “Even if it were possible that someone else sent the messages from the profile matching [the] defendant’s name and picture, the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable person to be satisfied that it was, in fact, [the] defendant who sent them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.