Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/5/2021
State v. Acosta
Citations
- 311 Or. App. 136
- 489 P.3d 608
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the trial court erred in excluding Facebook messages that “included substance that was uniquely associated with [the] defendant” or only a very small group of people who were using the account at the time
- concluding that the trial court erred 12 in excluding Facebook messages that “included substance that was uniquely 13 associated with [the] defendant” or only a very small group of people who were 14 using the account at the time
- “Even if it were possible that someone else sent the messages from the profile matching [the] defendant’s name and picture, the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable person to be satisfied that it was, in fact, [the] defendant who sent them.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: James
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court· 1991-03-21· cited 127×
- State v. CivilCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-01-11· cited 127×
- United States v. Tony BrowneThird Circuit· 2016-08-25· cited 65×
- State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court· 2004-10-21· cited 56×
- United States v. Johnny Lang, Also Known as Melvin Pitchford, and Shari Lewis LangTenth Circuit· 2005-04-12· cited 48×
- United States v. LangTenth Circuit· 2004-04-21· cited 47×
- United States v. TannD.C. Circuit· 2008-07-11· cited 46×
- Jones v. NATIONAL AMERICAN UNIVERSITYEighth Circuit· 2010-06-23· cited 41×
- United States v. GarzaFirst Circuit· 2006-01-24· cited 33×
- State v. CornellOregon Supreme Court· 1992-11-25· cited 31×
- State v. IseliOregon Supreme Court· 2020-02-21· cited 20×
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-07-03· cited 19×
- State v. SassariniCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-16· cited 18×
- State v. ParkCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-01· cited 13×
- United States v. Vazquez-SotoFirst Circuit· 2019-10-01· cited 13×
- State v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court· 2021-03-04· cited 9×
- United States v. TannDistrict of Columbia· 2006-03-21· cited 5×
- State v. H. D. E.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-05-28· cited 5×
- State v. NavaieCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-11-12· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.