Connecticut Appellate Court· 9/26/1989
State v. Person
Citations
- 20 Conn. App. 115
- 564 A.2d 626
- 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 324
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- testimony that defendant did not fit profile of pedophile properly excluded because Frye test not met
- trial court did not err in prohibiting defendant from establishing, through testimony of a psychiatrist and psychologist, that he did not fit the profile of a pedophile, because of insufficient reliability
- “Because the defendant never established that his expert witnesses had expertise in areas directly related to intrafamily sexual abuse, the trial court could reasonably have concluded that it was unlikely that their testimony would be of help to the jury.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spallone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. DobekMichigan Court of Appeals· 2007-05-14· cited 1,294×
- People v. AvantMichigan Court of Appeals· 1999-08-09· cited 313×
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-08-19· cited 196×
- Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-08· cited 99×
- Gale v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1990-05-02· cited 80×
- State v. JarrellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-05-13· cited 38×
- State v. LaskyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-11-26· cited 32×
- State v. ParkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals· 1996-01-03· cited 31×
- State v. PersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-07-17· cited 28×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-07-16· cited 28×
- State v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-05-19· cited 27×
- State v. GreenConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-03-06· cited 27×
- State v. FloraySuperior Court of Delaware· 1997-07-07· cited 16×
- State v. DennisonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-12-24· cited 16×
- Byrd v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 15×
- State v. WegmanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-06-04· cited 14×
- State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2002-04-12· cited 12×
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-02-25· cited 12×
- State v. WalkerMontana Supreme Court· 2018-12-19· cited 11×
- State v. ClarkConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-03-06· cited 10×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-06-05· cited 917×
- Namet v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 498×
- State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-02-07· cited 159×
- State v. SpigaroloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-03-14· cited 159×
- United States v. Robert William Maloney, Robert Murphy and Paul MerrickSecond Circuit· 1959-01-15· cited 122×
- State v. LoebachSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-09-11· cited 110×
- State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-25· cited 108×
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-04-22· cited 107×
- State v. FritzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-06-23· cited 98×
- State v. ReddickSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-08-06· cited 90×
- State v. ClaflinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-11-06· cited 80×
- State v. DeAngelisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-06-17· cited 74×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-01-05· cited 74×
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1983-05-25· cited 72×
- State v. EcholsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1975-12-09· cited 67×
- State v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-06-12· cited 45×
- State v. HasanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-15· cited 41×
- State v. HancichSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-07-29· cited 39×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.