Skip to main content

Sanders v. State

Citations

  • 303 S.E.2d 13
  • 251 Ga. 70

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that improper admission of expert testimony was harmless in light of otherwise overwhelming evidence and fact that testimony covering substantially the same area was introduced without challenge
  • holding that improper admission of expert testimony was harmless in light of otherwise overwhelming evidence and fact that testimony covering substantially the same area was introduced without challenge
  • refusing to allow the State to introduce evidence concerning the “battering parent syndrome” unless the defendant placed her character in issue or raised some defense to which the syndrome was relevant
  • refusing to allow the State to introduce evidence concerning the \battering parent syndrome\ unless the defendant placed her character in issue or raised some defense to which the syndrome was relevant
  • battered parent syndrome offered against defendant was error because defendant had not placed her character at issue or raised some defense necessitating such evidence
  • battered parent syndrome offered against defendant was error because defendant had not placed her character at issue or raised some defense necessitating such evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Smith, Weltner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.