Skip to main content

State v. Person

Citations

  • 236 Conn. 342
  • 673 A.2d 463
  • 1996 Conn. LEXIS 56

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant entitled to jury instruction on affirmative defense only if there is sufficient evidence for rational juror to find all elements of defense established by preponderance of evidence
  • “no rule of law prevents a jury from being charged, when requested, on the defense of extreme emotional disturbance simply because the defendant has testified that he or she was not upset”
  • defendant’s presentation of inconsistent defenses may be “self-penalizing . . . because it will . . . encourage jury skepticism about his entire defense” [citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted] [Borden, J., concurring]
  • “[t]he fact that one defense is on the theory that [the] accused did not commit the offense . . . does not deprive him of the right to avail himself of other defenses” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • applying standard to affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance
  • applying standard to affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berdon, Borden, Callahan, Norcott, Palmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.