Connecticut Appellate Court· 10/12/1999
State v. Miller
Citations
- 55 Conn. App. 298
- 739 A.2d 1264
- 1999 Conn. App. LEXIS 398
- 1999 WL 810639
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant need not admit to having acted intentionally to assert claim of self-defense
- defendant need not admit to having acted intentionally to assert claim of self-defense
- \[a] defendant is permitted to present inconsistent defenses to a jury\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hennessy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- v. WakefieldColorado Court of Appeals· 2018-03-22· cited 178×
- State v. SingletonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-28· cited 45×
- State v. SingletonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-09-26· cited 14×
- State v. McCoyWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2006-05-24· cited 9×
- State v. BaptisteConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-02-21· cited 8×
- State v. MartinezConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-03-25· cited 6×
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-05-08· cited 4×
- State v. BryanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-02-15· cited 1×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-02-02
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-03-19· cited 38×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-02-15· cited 29×
- State v. FolsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1987-05-05· cited 18×
- State v. DeptulaConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-04-27· cited 16×
- State v. DeptulaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-02-01· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.