State v. Williams
Citations
- 352 Conn. 104
Syllabus
Convicted of manslaughter in the first degree with a firearm, criminal posses- sion of a firearm, criminal possession of ammunition, and carrying a pistol without a permit, the defendant appealed to this court. The defendant's conviction arose from an incident in which he shot and killed a third-party bystander while shooting at another individual who had shot at the defendant first. With respect to the first degree manslaughter charge, the state alleged that the defendant, under circumstances evincing an extreme indifference to human life, had recklessly engaged in conduct that created a grave risk of death to the victim and had caused the victim's death while he was using a firearm. The defendant claimed, inter alia, that the trial court, which had instructed the jury on the defense of self-defense with respect to the charge of murder, of which the defendant was found not guilty, had improperly declined the defendant's request to instruct the jury on that defense with respect to the charge of manslaughter in the first degree with a firearm. The defendant also claimed that his conviction of both criminal possession of a firearm and criminal possession of ammunition violated the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. Held: The trial court's failure to provide the jury with a self-defense instruction for the charge of manslaughter in the first degree with a firearm violated the defendant's constitutional rights to due process and to present a defense, and, accordingly, this court reversed the judgment of conviction as to that charge and ordered a new trial on that charge only. Upon reviewing the rationale for justification defenses and the relevant case law from Connecticut and other states, this court concluded that, when the evidence so warrants, a trial court must instruct the jury on self-defense in connection with a reckless manslaughter charge, regardless of whether the victim is a bystander or the alleged aggressor. 352 Conn. 104 JUNE, 2025 105 St
Judges: Mullins; McDonald; D’Auria; Ecker; Alexander; Dannehy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-03-09· cited 1,588×
- State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 242×
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-24· cited 156×
- People v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court· 1973-12-18· cited 154×
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-06-01· cited 101×
- State v. CorchadoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-12-14· cited 92×
- State v. FabricatoreSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-02-27· cited 91×
- State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-12-11· cited 90×
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-15· cited 86×
- United States v. James Berry, Jr.Fifth Circuit· 1992-11-05· cited 79×
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-09-04· cited 75×
- State v. RawlsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-12-17· cited 75×
- Morris v. PlattSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1864-02-15· cited 73×
- State v. SalzSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-06-22· cited 69×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-07-27· cited 69×
- State v. CollinsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 62×
- State v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-07-29· cited 60×
- State v. WhitfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-07-02· cited 59×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.