Skip to main content

State v. Perry

Citations

  • 590 A.2d 624
  • 124 N.J. 128
  • 1991 N.J. LEXIS 45

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that trial court properly imposed consecutive sentences even though four of Yarbough' s five factors militated in favor of concurrent sentences
  • concluding that trial court properly imposed consecutive sentences even though four of Yarbough’s five factors militated in favor of concurrent sentences
  • finding one general question investigating potential presence of “any passion, prejudice, sympathy or bias” is sufficient absent request from counsel for more specific inquiry
  • upholding imposition of consecutive sentences despite four of Yarbough's five factors militating in favor of concurrent sentences
  • upholding imposition of consecutive sentences despite four of Yarbough's five factors militated in favor of concurrent sentences
  • finding consecutive sentences proper even though four of Yarbough's five factors favored concurrent sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garibaldi, Handler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

91 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

81 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.