Skip to main content

State v. Sumlin

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 550

Syllabus

Consecutive sentences; awaiting trial; statutory interpretation; under indictment. Defendant was under indictment but had not yet been arraigned when he committed criminal offenses in a second case. The court determined that since he was under indictment when he committed the offenses, he was \awaiting trial\ as required under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)(a).

Judges: Sheehan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.