State v. Peluso
Citations
- 344 Conn. 404
Syllabus
Convicted of the crimes of sexual assault in the first degree, sexual assault in the fourth degree, and risk of injury to a child in connection with the alleged sexual abuse of the minor victim, the defendant appealed. The sexual abuse allegedly occurred when the defendant was living in the same condominium complex as the victim and her family. The original information and the long form substitute information, the latter of which was filed three weeks before the start of evidence, both alleged that the abuse occurred in 2010 or 2011, when the victim was in the fifth grade, which was consistent with the victim's sworn statement to the police. At trial, however, the victim testified that the alleged abuse occurred in 2008 or 2009, when she was in the third grade. Thereafter, the defense moved for a judgment of acquittal on the ground that the alleged offenses could not have occurred in the time frame alleged in the long form information because the defendant did not live in the condominium complex at that time. In response, the state moved to amend its information to allege that the incidents of abuse had occurred in 2008 or 2009, consistent with the victim's testimony. Defense counsel objected, arguing that the state had failed to show good cause for the late amendment, as required by the applicable rule of practice (§ 36- 18), insofar as the prosecutor admitted to the court that the state had become aware two to four weeks before the start of trial, when preparing the victim for her court appearance, that the time frame alleged in the information was inaccurate and that the alleged incidents of abuse could not have occurred in 2010 or 2011. Defense counsel also argued that the defendant would be prejudiced by the late amendment because the defendant's entire defense was based on the fact that he did not live in the condominium complex in 2010 or 2011. The trial court granted the state's motion to amend its information, determining that there was good cause for the l
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Supreme Court may modify certified question as necessary
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McDonald; D’Auria; Mullins; Kahn; Ecker; Keller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-05-21· cited 1,715×
- United States v. Wayne Lewis CharleyTenth Circuit· 1999-08-27· cited 221×
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-12-13· cited 107×
- State v. BerginSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-04-24· cited 83×
- Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-11-15· cited 64×
- Kenyatta Erkins v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2014-07-22· cited 56×
- State v. LaracuenteSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-12-15· cited 52×
- Fisher v. Big Y Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-09-21· cited 41×
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1978-11-28· cited 36×
- State v. TanzellaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-07-27· cited 36×
- In Re Tayler F.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-08· cited 32×
- State v. TutsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-06-27· cited 27×
- State v. Wilson F.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-06-17· cited 22×
- State v. AyalaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2017-02-07· cited 18×
- State v. John B.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-07-17· cited 14×
- State v. GrantConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-05-25· cited 14×
- Estrada-Machado v. United States and Quintero-Jasso v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2003-10-06· cited 13×
- State v. JordanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-03-14· cited 13×
- State v. JordanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-01-10· cited 13×
- State v. CarneiroConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-04-29· cited 13×
Other cases named State v. Peluso
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.