Carpenter v. Daar
Citations
- 346 Conn. 80
Syllabus
Pursuant to statute (§ 52-190a (a)), a complaint sounding in medical malprac- tice must be accompanied by a good faith certificate and ''a written and signed opinion of a similar health care provider, as defined in section 52-184c . . . that there appears to be evidence of medical negligence and includes a detailed basis for the formation of such opinion.'' The plaintiff sought to recover damages from the named defendant, D, a dentist, and D's practice, P Co., for malpractice in connection with a root canal surgery D performed on the plaintiff. The plaintiff alleged that, during the surgery, D negligently failed to diagnose and treat an infection in the plaintiff's tooth and that, as a result, the plaintiff suffered a serious infection that required additional medical care, surgery, and dental treatment. The plaintiff attached to his complaint a good faith certificate and an opinion letter from S, an endodontist, along with a description of S's credentials in endodontics. In his complaint, the plain- tiff alleged that S was a ''similar health care provider,'' as defined by statute (§ 52-184c (c)), to D, who the plaintiff alleged had held himself out as a specialist in endodontics. In support of that allegation, the plaintiff quoted text from P Co.'s website indicating that D had completed hundreds of hours in training in endodontics, which the website described as dealing with tissues and structures inside the tooth. The defendants moved to dismiss the action on the ground that the opinion letter did not comply with §§ 52-190a (a) and 52-184c insofar as it failed to establish that S was a ''similar health care provider'' to D, who was a general dentist and not a specialist in endodontics. The defendants asserted that S was not a ''similar health care provider'' under the 346 Conn. 80 FEBRUARY, 2023 81 Carpenter v. Daar definition of that term in § 52-184c (c) because D was not a specialist in endodontics and did not hold himself out to be one, or the definition of t
Judges: Robinson; McDonald; D’Auria; Mullins; Kahn; Ecker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-05-03· cited 447×
- State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-07-01· cited 243×
- LeConche v. ElligersSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-07-24· cited 224×
- Halpern v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-07-16· cited 173×
- Lombard Brothers, Inc. v. General Asset Management Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-05-31· cited 166×
- Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-06· cited 154×
- Commissioner of Environmental Protection v. Connecticut Building Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-10· cited 106×
- Conboy v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-21· cited 100×
- Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-09-05· cited 91×
- Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-22· cited 82×
- Millbrook Owners Ass'n v. Hamilton StandardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-07-24· cited 82×
- Lostritto v. Community Action Agency of New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-05-18· cited 77×
- Corley v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 2021-08-25· cited 72×
- Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-07· cited 62×
- George v. EricsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-08-24· cited 60×
- Bennett v. New Milford Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 46×
- Hartford/Windsor Healthcare Properties, LLC v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-08-31· cited 46×
- Votre v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-04-07· cited 41×
- Morgan v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-07-12· cited 39×
- Plante v. Charlotte Hungerford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.