Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/19/1987
State v. Peake
Citations
- 352 S.E.2d 487
- 291 S.C. 138
- 1987 S.C. LEXIS 198
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the test for determining the admissibility of a statement is whether it is knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily given
- holding the State failed to meet its burden of showing the appellant's statement was voluntary and not the product of the officer's promise of leniency when the officer's promise was tantamount to a promise not to seek the death penalty if the appellant gave a statement
- “A statement induced by a promise of leniency is involuntary only if so connected with the inducement as to be a consequence of the promise.”
- “The test for determining the admissibility of a statement is whether it was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily given under the totality of the circumstances.”
- “The test for determining the admissibility of a statement is whether it was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily given under the totality of the circumstances.”
- The test for determining the admissibility of a statement is whether it was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily given under the totality of the circumstances.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Finney, Ness, Gregory, Harwell, Chandler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SaltzSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-06· cited 162×
- State v. RochesterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-04-02· cited 90×
- State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-09-04· cited 72×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-19· cited 59×
- State v. ChildsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-11-13· cited 54×
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-07-11· cited 34×
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-11-14· cited 34×
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-02-29· cited 26×
- State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-25· cited 23×
- State v. PugsleyIdaho Court of Appeals· 1995-12-05· cited 19×
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-12-23· cited 18×
- State v. RiosCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-07-14· cited 17×
- State v. ArrowoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-17· cited 12×
- State v. PeakeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-09-17· cited 8×
- State v. BoysSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-10-29· cited 5×
- State v. HookCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-12-17· cited 5×
- Shirley v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-11-12· cited 1×
- State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-09-01
- State v. Johnathan L. HillaryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2023-08-02
- State v. Robert Lee Miller, IIISupreme Court of South Carolina· 2023-09-13
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.