Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2/29/1988

State v. Howard

Citations

369 S.E.2d 132
295 S.C. 462
1988 S.C. LEXIS 74

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that “Howard’s unredacted confession contained no mitigating evidence,” and therefore, that there was “no prejudice from its exclusion at the penalty phase of the trial”
confessions to seventy armed robberies and another murder were properly admitted in penalty phase as evidence of other crimes relevant to the defendant’s character
confessions to seventy armed robberies and another murder were properly admitted in penalty phase as evidence of other crimes relevant to the defendant's character
when information contained in the improperly admitted affidavit is merely cumulative to other properly admitted evidence, there is no prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gregory, Ness, Harwell, Littlejohn, Finney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.