Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/11/1988
State v. Washington
Citations
- 370 S.E.2d 611
- 296 S.C. 54
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- clarifying that, although state must prove voluntariness of confession beyond reasonable doubt at trial, voluntariness need only be proven by preponderance of evidence at suppression hearing
- clarifying that, although state must prove voluntariness of confession beyond reasonable doubt at trial, voluntariness need only be proven by preponderance of evidence at suppression hearing
- \The trial court's factual conclusions as to the voluntariness of a statement will not be disturbed on appeal unless so manifestly erroneous as to show an abuse of discretion.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chandler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. SaltzSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-06· cited 162×
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-04-24· cited 129×
- State v. Von DohlenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-05-28· cited 85×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-19· cited 59×
- State v. ChildsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-11-13· cited 54×
- State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-06-17· cited 49×
- State v. SantiagoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-06-19· cited 49×
- State v. FranklinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-08-14· cited 45×
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-11-14· cited 34×
- State v. WyattSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-01-09· cited 33×
- State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-25· cited 23×
- State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-12-23· cited 18×
- State v. SalisburyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-02-17· cited 17×
- State v. ArrowoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-17· cited 12×
- State v. LedfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-07-15· cited 9×
- State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-12-29· cited 7×
- State v. DyeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-06-04· cited 5×
- State v. HookCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-12-17· cited 5×
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-01-02· cited 2×
- State v. SamuelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-11-14· cited 1×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-10-06· cited 90×
- Wimberly v. Labor and Industrial Relations Comm'n of Mo.Supreme Court· 1987-01-21· cited 42×
- State v. MiddletonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-02-22· cited 41×
- State v. NeeleySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-05-18· cited 36×
- State v. PeakeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-01-19· cited 30×
- State v. DraytonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-11-19· cited 21×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-03-28· cited 18×
- In the Interest of Christopher W.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-04-22· cited 11×
- State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-07-11· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.