Skip to main content

Coppola v. Coppola

Citations

  • 243 Conn. 657
  • 707 A.2d 281
  • 1998 Conn. LEXIS 38

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the pmpose of § 52-72 is to provide for amendment of otherwise incurable defects that go to the court’s jurisdiction” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • remedial statutes must be construed in favor of those whom legislature intended to benefit
  • “[o]ur practice does not favor the termination of proceedings without a determination of the merits of the controversy where that can be brought about with due regard to necessary rules of procedure” [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • \[o]ur practice does not favor the termination of proceedings without a determination of the merits of the controversy where that can be brought about with due regard to necessary rules of procedure\ [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norcott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Coppola v. Coppola

15 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.