Arizona Supreme Court· 6/13/1977

State v. Lamb

Citations

568 P.2d 1032
116 Ariz. 134
1977 Ariz. LEXIS 345

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that evidence obtained in illegal pat-down search was admissible because defendant would have been arrested on grounds independent of the search and the evidence would have inevitably been discovered during a lawful search incident to arrest
concluding that evidence obtained in illegal pat-down search was admissible because defendant would have been arrested on grounds independent of the search and the evidence would have inevitably been discovered during a lawful search incident to arrest
“[Ejvidence obtained as a result of an unlawful search need not be suppressed where, in the normal course of the police investigation and absent the illicit conduct, the evidence would have been discovered anyway.”
evidence obtained during an illegal pat down search was admissible because defen dant would have been arrested on independent grounds and the evidence would inevitably have been discovered during a lawful search incident to that arrest
direct evidence suppressed; independent evidence properly admitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cameron, Struckmeyer, Hays, Gordon, Holohan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.