Supreme Court of Kansas· 2/1/2008

State v. Paul

Citations

175 P.3d 840
285 Kan. 658
2008 Kan. LEXIS 13

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

A criminal defendant has the obligation to designate a record sufficient to support a claim of reviewable error on appeal.
court should not read statute to “add language that is not found in it”
The burden is on the appellant to furnish a record to support a claim of error at thé trial court. Without such a record, the claim of alleged error fails.
court resorts to maxims of construction when statute is ambiguous, i.e., contains language of doubtful or conflicting meaning and leaves uncertainty as to which of multiple meanings is proper
when defendant fails to designate sufficient record to show error, claim must be denied
when defendant fails to designate sufficient record to show error, claim must be denied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Johnson, Hill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.