Washington Supreme Court· 5/22/1997

State v. Parker

Citations

132 Wash. 2d 182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

remand is proper when the reviewing court cannot tell if it would impose exceptional sentence notwithstanding standard range error
where jury not asked to determine when offenses committed, and statute spanned charging period, application of standard range to offenses committed at end of charging period was erroneous
when the sentencing court incorrectly calculates the standard range before imposing an exceptional sentence, remand is the remedy unless the record clearly indicates the sentencing court would have imposed the same sentence anyway
improperly calculated standard range is legal error subject to review
“Evidence was given showing Parker committed the acts before the increase in penalties.”
“Evidence was given showing Parker committed the acts before the increase in penalties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sanders

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.