Court of Appeals of Washington· 10/17/1997

State v. McCorkle

Citations

945 P.2d 736
88 Wash. App. 485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that remand without another opportunity to prove the classification of a prior offense is the appropriate remedy if the defendant objects to the State's evidence and the State then fails to satisfy its burden
noting that remand without another opportunity to prove the classification of a prior offense is the appropriate remedy if the defendant objects to the State’s evidence and the State then fails to satisfy its burden
\The key inquiry is under what Washington statute could the defendant have been convicted if he or she had committed the same acts in Washington.\
“The key inquiry is under what Washington statute could the defendant have been convicted if he or she had committed the same acts in Washington.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.