Skip to main content

State v. Parker

Citations

  • 89 P.3d 622
  • 277 Kan. 838
  • 2004 Kan. LEXIS 270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • An abuse of discretion has occurred when the admitted photographs were unduly repetitious and cumulative or their introduction was solely for Are purpose of prejudice.
  • \`\[p]hotographs which are relevant and material in assisting the jury's understanding of medical testimony are admissible\'\
  • An abuse of discretion has occurred when the admitted photographs were unduly repetitious and cumulative or their introduction was solely for the purpose of prejudice.
  • district court properly admitted videotape of crime scene in murder prosecution as it was useful for acquainting the jurors with the crime scene
  • \[T]he rationale underlying the contemporaneous objection rule is to permit the trial court to avert error by precluding improper evidence.\
  • “[T]he rationale underlying the contemporaneous objection rule is to permit the trial court to avert error by precluding improper evidence. [Citation omitted.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allegrucci

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.