State v. Whitesell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant’s act of sending the victim a Bible with threatening messages was not protected religious activity or protected speech
• finding that witnesses’ testimony of prior consistent statements of victim who testified at trial was not hearsay under K.S.A. 60-460[a]
• upholding Rucker in finding the term “legitimate purpose” was not unconstitutionally vague
• using terms “new trial” and “mistrial” interchangeably when discussing standard of review
• using terms \new trial\ and \mistrial\ interchangeably when discussing standard of review
• finding to predecessor to K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 60-31a02 is not unconstitutionally overbroad on its face, as \the type of speech and conduct which it prohibits is not the kind protected by the First Amendment\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).