Arizona Supreme Court· 8/4/1988
State v. Oliver
Citations
- 760 P.2d 1071
- 158 Ariz. 22
- 14 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 7
- 1988 Ariz. LEXIS 136
- 1988 WL 81139
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant must show that the victim had previously been exposed to a sexual act and that the prior sexual act was sufficiently similar to the present sexual act to give the victim the experience and ability to contrive or imagine the molestation charge
- \the defendant must establish that the prior sexual act was sufficiently similar to the present sexual act to give the victim the experience and ability to contrive or imagine the molestation charge\
- Sixth Amendment right to present evidence limited to relevant evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon, Feldman, Cameron, Holohan, Moeller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. StanawayMichigan Supreme Court· 1994-08-29· cited 494×
- State v. FulminanteArizona Supreme Court· 1999-03-02· cited 125×
- State v. KiperCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-10-24· cited 124×
- State v. BudisSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1991-08-06· cited 114×
- State v. WestArizona Supreme Court· 1993-09-30· cited 113×
- State v. DickensArizona Supreme Court· 1996-10-31· cited 112×
- State of Arizona v. Angelino Paolo Buccheri-BiancaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-10-30· cited 79×
- State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court· 1997-07-15· cited 72×
- State v. DixonArizona Supreme Court· 2011-05-06· cited 64×
- People v. AldrichColorado Court of Appeals· 1992-08-13· cited 58×
- State v. CookArizona Supreme Court· 1991-12-05· cited 55×
- Oatts v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-01-20· cited 54×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa· 1992-07-22· cited 52×
- State of Arizona v. Edward James RoseArizona Supreme Court· 2013-04-04· cited 50×
- United States v. StamperW.D. North Carolina· 1991-06-12· cited 45×
- State v. BargerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-10-25· cited 42×
- State v. TownsendSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2006-04-13· cited 40×
- State v. MolenIdaho Court of Appeals· 2010-01-12· cited 39×
- State v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court· 1991-09-17· cited 37×
- State v. SpeersCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-09-28· cited 30×
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- State v. LeonArizona Supreme Court· 1969-03-14· cited 1,311×
- McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1983-10-03· cited 975×
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-11· cited 423×
- State v. JeffersArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-24· cited 217×
- State v. AdamsonArizona Supreme Court· 1983-04-11· cited 201×
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-05-20· cited 191×
- State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court· 1984-06-14· cited 190×
- State v. LindseyArizona Supreme Court· 1986-06-26· cited 175×
- Reginald Carter v. Lowell D. Hewitt, Superintendent John Fuiek, C.O. Duane D. Pyles, C.O. And Gilbert Levi, C.O.Third Circuit· 1980-02-27· cited 160×
- State v. PeyattWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-12-15· cited 130×
- People v. ArendaMichigan Supreme Court· 1982-12-23· cited 127×
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-02-23· cited 119×
- United States v. The Southland Corporation and S. Richmond Dole and Eugene Mastropieri, the Southland Corporation, Eugene MastropieriSecond Circuit· 1985-04-23· cited 97×
- State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1976-02-02· cited 90×
- State v. HensleyArizona Supreme Court· 1984-11-28· cited 69×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.