Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Davis

Citations

  • 541 A.2d 315
  • 518 Pa. 77
  • 1988 Pa. LEXIS 155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial counsel ineffective for failing to object to expert testimony that children typically have had some sort of sexual experience in order to report abuse because such testimony assessed children’s truthfulness
  • holding trial counsel ineffective for failing to object to expert testimony that children typically have had some sort of sexual experience in order to report abuse because such testimony assessed children’s truthfulness
  • finding counsel ineffective for failing to object to expert testimony where only evidence of abuse was single victim’s testimony
  • remanding for a new trial where trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to object to expert testimony regarding the credibility of sexually abused children
  • prohibiting expert testimony that child sex abuse victims lack ability to fabricate
  • error to allow expert to testify that child sex abuse victims generally lack the ability to fabricate stories of sexual experiences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

120 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.