Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 3/17/2003
State v. East
Citations
- 578 S.E.2d 748
- 353 S.C. 634
- 2003 S.C. App. LEXIS 34
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- emphasizing the trial court instructed the jury to find whether the defendant possessed the requisite intent to commit both crimes—armed robbery and kidnapping
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hearn, Goolsby, Shuler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. NeumanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-06-29· cited 13×
- State v. EldersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-01-28· cited 11×
- State v. Gabrielle Oliva Lashane Davis KocsisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2022-05-04
- State v. Tammy C. MoorerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2023-06-07
- State v. Sidney Moorer (2)Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2023-06-07
- State v. Tammy C. MoorerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2023-07-05
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. AnthonyTennessee Supreme Court· 1991-09-23· cited 280×
- State v. TuckerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-01-25· cited 45×
- State v. CreechCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-01-31· cited 27×
- State v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-01-12· cited 27×
- State v. HallSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-12-21· cited 19×
- State v. CharpingSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-11-23· cited 13×
- State v. BerntsenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-03-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.